My experience as a young leader at the UN Climate Conference

November 25, 2024

Attending the UN Climate Change Conference (COP29) in Baku, Azerbaijan was an exhilarating experience for me as a young leader. I had the opportunity to witness firsthand the complexities of such large-scale international conferences. On one hand, the commitment to addressing the climate crisis was inspiring; on the other hand, certain contradictions and slow progress revealed that there is still a long way to go.

This experience allowed me to better understand the workings of global climate diplomacy. The diversity of participants—from NGOs to young leaders, scientists and government representatives—was impressive. Yet, this very diversity sometimes caused coordination challenges in decision-making processes. Alongside moments of hope, I also witnessed instances of frustration and missed opportunities.

Young man standing in front of a COP29 sign

Attending the UN Climate Conference was an opportunity for Oğuz and other young leaders to witness the complexities of inter-governmental negotiations.

  1. Insufficient financial commitments

    One of the most striking aspects of the conference was the discussion around climate financing for developing countries. Unfortunately, there was little tangible progress in this area. Topics like the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) were discussed, but there was a lack of clarity on how these commitments would be fulfilled. Representatives from developing countries repeatedly highlighted how promises made in the past had often gone unfulfilled. This underscores the reluctance of wealthier nations to fully assume their responsibilities.

  2. Contradictions in fossil fuel discussions

    The transition away from fossil fuels was both widely recognized as a necessity and yet remained a taboo topic for many countries. While strong demands were made at the conference to accelerate the phase-out of fossil fuels, economic concerns prevented significant progress. For example, fossil fuel-dependent economies refused to commit to this transition without more concrete support mechanisms. This hesitation represents a major barrier to meaningful change.

  3. The risk of symbolic youth participation

    Youth participation at COP29 was strong and inspiring, but in some panels, it felt more symbolic than substantive. Young leaders were often applauded during speeches but were rarely involved in actual policymaking processes. This is a disservice not only to young people but also to the innovative ideas they bring to the table. Youth contributions need to be meaningfully incorporated into decision-making mechanisms.

"Youth participation at COP29 was strong and inspiring, but in some panels, it felt more symbolic than substantive."

Youth play a crucial role in addressing the climate crisis, but their importance is often underappreciated. With innovative ideas and the ability to leverage technology, young people have the potential to create significant impact both locally and globally. However, at major platforms like COP29, their voices often risk being drowned out in mainstream discussions.

Young leaders must go beyond critique to offer concrete solutions and actively participate in local projects to build credibility and influence. From my own experience, I believe that youth energy and motivation should not just be rhetorical tools but must be integrated into policymaking processes. This is not just essential for empowering young people but also critical for the future of climate action.

Photos of Oguz participating at the UN Climate Conference

Youth leaders are applauded during speeches and panel discussions, but their role in decision-making remains limited.

A call to action for all

My observations at COP29 compel me to issue distinct calls to action for individuals and decision-makers.

As individuals, we need to adopt more sustainable lifestyles. However, for these efforts to be effective, they must be supported by broader systemic changes.

For decision-makers, it is time for bolder and more decisive action against the climate crisis. Promises need to be transformed into actions, particularly regarding finance and the phase-out of fossil fuels. Additionally, the voices of young people must be amplified, and their innovative solutions must find a place in policy processes. Yet, as I saw repeatedly at COP29, political interests and economic concerns often overshadow the urgent need for change. Overcoming this will require greater solidarity within the international community.

Generation17 has provided me with a vital platform to amplify my voice in climate action. The power of technology, meanwhile, has been a game-changer. Through digital campaigns and mobile applications, I have been able to reach communities, raise awareness, and make our voices heard more widely.

COP29 was an experience filled with both hope and disappointment. The need for a global vision to combat the climate crisis was once again made clear, but translating this vision into concrete actions will require much greater effort. The energy and ideas of young people can serve as a driving force in this process. However, it is essential that this energy moves beyond being applauded in speeches and is actively integrated into real decision-making mechanisms.