A young woman in a mask raises her fist at a protest, surrounded by others holding signs.

Combining multiple datasets to understand gender based violence in public spaces in Mexico

Benefit

Evaluating the relative success of different policy measures

Methods
  • Citizen-generated data, Combining data sources, Crowdmapping, Geographic information system (GIS), Open data, Open source repository
People
  • GIZ Data Lab, GIZ Mexico, Center for Command, Control, Computing, Communications and Citizen Contact (C5) of Mexico City, Digital Agency for Public Innovation, Ministry of Women, women in Mexico City
Data

Open government datasets, non-public government datasets about GBV reports, [citizen-generated maps of safe locations]*

Technology

N/A

SDGs

5, 16

What is the problem?

In Mexico, more than half of the homicides of women in 2019 (52 per cent) occurred in public spaces.(link is external) High rates of femicide have drawn increased international attention. In the face of this growing problem and public pressure, the Government of Mexico City declared a public alert(link is external) about GBV in November 2019. Following the alert, it worked to increase the safety of public spaces in the city by introducing safer public pathways and panic buttons to encourage reporting of incidents. The impact of these different interventions on rates of violence in the city is still unclear and policy makers have been keen to understand where they have proved most successful.

 

What does the Accelerator Lab plan to do?

In collaboration with GIZ Data Lab and GIZ Mexico, the Lab is combining open data about urban infrastructure (such as public transport) with closed government datasets about the use of new panic buttons. They hope this will lead to a better understanding of the urban characteristics associated with GBV in public spaces across Mexico City. They will also work with datasets that tap into residents’ perceptions of urban safety, such as sentiment analysis of social media and crowdmapping with local women’s groups. By mobilizing these different sources of intelligence, they will test whether collective intelligence can help them to identify the urban spaces where women are safest (using a method known as data driven positive deviance(link is external)). Cross-correlating their findings with the known locations of the government’s safer pathways will also help the government to evaluate which policy measures have been most successful, in order to guide future interventions.

 

Figure 8: Exploratory spatial analysis of different parts of Mexico City

Colors reveal clusters defined by population density and average incoming trips by women.

 

Colorful map highlighting different areas with various color-coded regions.

 

What does this experience tell us about collective intelligence design?

The Lab has benefited from the government’s long standing support of open data practices and existing data infrastructure within the public sector. However, negotiating a Memorandum of Understanding for the use of non-public government datasets can still take many months. To overcome this, the Lab has started by working with open datasets to develop a proof of concept. Thinking creatively about how they can already work with existing available data, as they wait to finalize data sharing agreements, has given the team flexibility and time to experiment with new methods.